The Citadel Home Page The Citadel Home Page
The Citadel The Citadel
The Citadel
The Citadel
Admissions & Financial Aid

Alumni

Athletics

Academics

Citadel Foundation

Corps of Cadets

Faculty & Staff

Giving to The Citadel

Graduate & Professional Studies

Library


Associate Provost Home Page
 
Citadel Home Page
The Citadel
171 Moultrie Street
Charleston, S C 29409
Phone: (843) 953-5155
Fax: (843) 953-5896


Institutional Effectiveness Summary Report

August 2000

 

Physics
The Citadel's Physics Program was reviewed in fall 1996 (self-study was developed in the 1995-96 academic year). The consultants' report recommended full program approval. This report raised issues of diversity, sabbatical leaves, and pedagogical approaches used in the two basic Core Curriculum physics sequences. While no faculty openings have enabled the College to address the diversity issue, two of the six faculty members have been awarded sabbatical leaves, and the two basic Core Curriculum physics sequences have been completely redesigned with new, computer driven lab experiments.
 
The following information has been extracted from the Annual Assessment Report from the Department of Physics.

 

Mission
The primary mission of the Department of Physics is to provide full academic support for:
  a.  the BS major in Physics and a minor in Applied Physics,
  b.  the Core Curriculum through basic sequences in Physics on calculus and
      algebra levels, as well as general elective courses in astronomy, in order to
      meet the needs of all non-physics majors,
  c.  the engineering programs through professional elective courses.
 
Expected Results
Physics majors should be adequately prepared for graduate study in physics or closely related disciplines. The curriculum will be broad enough to prepare all physics majors for a wide range of careers in education at the secondary level, research and industrial scientific laboratories, high-technology branches of the Armed Forces, as well as other careers that require analytical thinking with a mathematical and scientific background.
 
After completing the physics core curriculum sequence, engineering and non-physics science majors will be adequately prepared for passing the physics portions of standard graduate or professional school qualifying examinations such as GRE or MCAT.
 
The important (if not the principle) objective of the College Physics sequence is to influence the students' attitudes towards physics, which for an average student is difficult, mathematical in nature, and concentrates on questions of little relevance for an "ordinary person." For this reason, the assessment of this physics sequence is heavily weighted toward its initial attraction for students (at least 15% of the non-science majors in each class will select PHYS 203/204 to address their Core Science Requirement) and student retention (at least 85% of the students who begin PHYS 203 will complete it and at least 90% of these students will continue with PHYS 204 and complete the sequence). In addition, the level of understanding and appreciation of physics will be reflected in the overall success of the students (at least 90% of these who pass the course will do it with grades of C or higher).
 
Assessment Tools
The department head conducts interviews with graduating seniors to ask for their opinions on the quality and structure of the Physics major. Due to historically small numbers of graduating majors and their divergent career interest.
 
The assessment of the structure and content of the basic Core Curriculum sequences is carried out by a department faculty survey. These sequences are compared with those in other institutions. The department head also visits the engineering and science departments asking for their assessment of the preparations of their students in the basic concepts of physics.
 
Assessment Results
For many years all our majors who expressed interest in graduate study have been accepted by one of the schools of their choice. The rest found no difficulty with finding desirable employment. Two physics majors graduated in 2000. One of them intends to continue in a graduate school in pedagogy after a one-year teaching internship, and the other has accepted a commission in the Air Force.
 
The results of the assessment of the lower division course offerings can be summarized as follows:
 
The liberal-arts sequence has been redesigned to better address the College's science core requirements. Its laboratory component places more emphasis on understanding of concepts of physics through discovery experience rather than on developing specific bench skills for work in a scientific laboratory. However, since some biology majors now take this course, the text has been changed and the coursework involves more problem solving than before. The course continues to be a success.
 
Satisfying the different expectations for the calculus-based sequence has turned out to be a difficult task. Considerable improvement in this sequence has been achieved by formally incorporating Modern Physics into it and replacing the system of four three-credit-hour lectures by a block of three three-credit-hour lectures supplemented by an additional hour for physics majors and minors and BS chemistry majors. The main difficulty in implementing the new system is the division of the course material between the three-hour main course and one hour additional topics lecture. The transition to the new system was relatively easy in the trials when most of the students were taking both sections. However, an unexpected problem in implementing the new system arose when it was offered to the engineering audience. While it is easy for a faculty to relegate portions of the material to the "extra hour" section, it turned out to be psychologically difficult to skip them altogether in the semester when the extra hour is not offered. In consequence, in the first attempt, more material was taught than students could absorb. The drop rate was unacceptable, approximately 20%, and the number of student complaints was large.
 
The problem will be resolved. A different textbook, more modular in style, and thus better suited to apportioning material between two variants of the course was adopted effective with the fall 2000 semester, and a more rigid, department-wide syllabus for this course will be adopted.
 
No final decision will be possible on the format of the entire revised sequence without thorough assessment of the actual trials with full-size classes which began in the 1999-2000 academic year.
 
The Department of Physics has moved from traditional lab experiments to experiments conducted through computer-interfaces. These experiments are driven by MacIntosh computers. All new experiments were purchased, installed, and tested before they were used in an actual instructional lab environment. In 1998-99, The Citadel Development Foundation provided $90,071 to purchase the lab experiments for the Physics with Calculus II Lab, the Modern Physics Lab, and the Nuclear Physics Lab. The mechanics and heat labs were developed in spring 1998 and offered first in fall 1998. The modern physics lab offered for the first time in spring 1999. The final lab in electromagnetism was developed in 1999-00.
 
Much of the assessment effort of the Department of Physics in the past two years has dealt with ensuring the successful implementation of the new Core Curriculum sequences. These efforts have consisted in the main of faculty surveys, discussion of course and lab content, and comparison of coverage of the new courses with that of comparable programs at other institutions.

»  2000 IE Summary Report
»  2000 IE Data Report